// Inconsistencies in Clinical Reporting of Nasopharyngoscopy for Evaluating Velopharyngeal Closure: A Multisite Study
本研究調查北美唇顎裂團隊使用標準化指南報告鼻咽鏡檢查結果的情況｜分析188份臨床報告發現，僅34%完整記錄所有建議的量化評估指標，團隊間報告一致性差異明顯｜作者建議採用標準化臨床模板並推動共識更新，以提升跨團隊的紀錄一致性與準確性。
// This study examined how consistently cleft teams in North America use standardized guidelines to report nasopharyngoscopy findings. Analysis of 188 clinical reports showed variability in documenting key quantitative ratings, with only 34% including all recommended measures. Reporting consistency differed significantly across teams, with some never or inconsistently including all ratings. The authors conclude that standardized clinical templates and renewed consensus efforts are needed to improve consistent documentation within and across teams.
Published 2026年6月5日
// 正在尋找相關文獻...